Keep Kamala and Carry On-ala

In the closing days of the 2024 presidential elections the vast majority of Americans have at least one thing in common:

WE CAN’T WAIT FOR IT TO BE OVER.

We’re on Interstellar time now

Not democracy, God(dess) forbid.

The horse race.

The Old Nag vs. the Young (by comparison) Filly.

Of course, it won’t fully be over Tuesday night, Wednesday morning or on any day this week.  The Old Nag has promised to keep punching up in class, believing the only way IT can lose is if the comparatively young(er) Filly cheats.  Hence the nationwide campaign to psychologically cast itself “the winner” in the minds of its supporters, encouraging their rage at the injustice of it all with the hope they will riot again and perhaps succeed this time at invalidating the results of a free and fair contest.

Trump logic

But it makes no matter. 

As sure as the horse Medina Spirit was denied its 2021 Kentucky Derby crown for trying to circumvent the rules, the Old Nag will similarly not reach the winner’s circle this Time Out. (Note: And please, someone give him one).

There will be a lot of hoopla, screeching bro pods, billionaire beefs and media meltdowns in the various man-o-spheres and blonde-ishspheres within right wing media.  But at the end of the day I have no doubt that this and they will come to naught, and in January the rightful victor will put their hand on the Bible (Note: A politically non-partisan one not shamelessly hawked by one of the candidates) at the Capitol building and America will have sworn in its rightful winner.

And first female president.

KAMALA HARRIS.

Wear shoes cuz there’s gonna be a lot of glass

And there is one group that we can most particularly thank for this good fortune – as well as all of our lives when you think about it —

WOMEN.

All the mothers, grandmothers, sisters, aunts, nieces, co-workers, neighbors, spouses, and friends who voted for her.

Thanks Ladies

Sure, it was a group project.  And no one’s taking away anything from anyone, most especially not from Kamala Harris herself, or her running mate, Tim Walz.  Nor Pres. Joe Biden, who did something that almost no man in a top job in America has ever done.

Step Aside.

For the “Girl.”

Thanks Joe

But this is what was bound to happen once they got the right to vote.

More than ONE HUNDRED YEARS AGO.

Does it make it any worse for Team Old Nag that this woman is a mixed race woman of color?  Probably.  But let’s table that for now and stay with what we all are beginning to see will be the deciding factor here unless we are deciding to turn away, put our hands over our ears and remain willfully ignorant.

You can’t take rights, especially bodily autonomy rights, away from a group that makes up the majority of the country (52%) and expect that majority to not exercise its power (and reject you) at the ballot box.  Especially in a democracy. 

Under his eye

Which is why the leaders of a lot of those rights-denying guys, Club Nag de Olde, are trying to Strong Man their way around the U.S. Constitution, spread disinformation, change the way we operate and declare victory before the votes are in. (Note: For more details on this and their future their plans, see #Project2025).

The first big turn of the screw – or as I am now calling it, The (Inevitable) November Surprise – was the release of the Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll this weekend that showed Kamala Harris has “leap-frogged” (Note: Their phrase, not mine) over The O.N. in Iowa., where she leads 47% to 44% among the state’s likely voters.

In my Field of Dreams feelings…

To demonstrate just how significant this is:

  1. This is a generally accurate, but fairly careful, poll.
  2. Iowa is ruby red state that delivered substantial presidential victories in 2016 and 2020 to the horse running against Ms. Harris.
  3. As recently as September, Ms. Harris was trailing in the state by 4%.

And –

d. Independent women now back Ms. Harris there by a whopping 28% margin and women over 65 support her by a more than 2-1 difference (63% to 28%).

White women assemble!

Of course, any poll is merely a snapshot in time, but to swing this far forward in the lead several days before Election Day in a state where your opponent was previously heavily favored in, and has substantially won in the past, is seismic – and portends something bigger.  Was it helped along by the Old Nag loudly neighing at a public appearance heard by millions of people that ITS going to “protect women” WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT?

Same vibe

There’s not a female I know that doesn’t understand what that tone and those words mean.  It tells them I am the ultimate decider of what’s best for you and there is nothing you can do about it.  At. All.

Just who are these Club Nag de Olde members?  Are they the real Aliens de Illegal?  Because in 2024, they bear so little resemblance to how the majority of us speak.  At least, in public.

Maybe she knows them?

This is not to take away anything from Vice President Harris, her pitch-perfect campaign, her many proposed policies or her consistently smart, joyful, confident and plain-speaking ability to communicate a vision of true American freedoms, hopes and values.

If you want a rundown of them go to her website:  kamalaharris.com  

If you need more of a comparison between what she offers vs. her rival, click here.

And here.

I think she just got to the Project 2025 bit

But at some point, American presidential elections begin to swing on intangibles that can’t be addressed by a single, or even multiple, policy position.  And those intangibles change depending on who the candidates are and the moment of history we are in. 

And not only our present, but our pasts.  And our future.

I’m one of those gay guys who has been privileged to have a number of close friendships with women over the years.  They are all wonderful and different and smart and supportive and from various generations.  But what they ALL do not tolerate is being talked down to, diminished or passive/aggressively (Note: Not to mention merely aggressively) bossed around by men.

Just try us

So when I saw the genuine RAGE of so many leading conservative male voices in reaction to a Harris 2024 ad geared towards religious women, Republican women, or women married to MAGA-type men, that told her who she voted for was HER CHOICE, and that you can “vote any you want and no one will know” and “what happens in the booth, stays in the booth”, I knew something significant had been unmasked.

One popular Fox host foamed that the visual of a wife lying by omission to her conservative husband about who she voted for was the equivalent of her having an affair.  A top-rated podcaster said it was inexcusable, proclaiming that her husband is likely breaking his back to “give her a nice life” and that this is the thanks he gets.  Others blabbered even more offensive stuff that I’ll leave to your imagination but if you want to know what they are go to this link, watch the commercials and google some of the reactions.

It is particularly noteworthy that this Harris commercial was conceived by an organization called Common Good, which is targeted towards people of faith whose religious leaders and families are telling them they are required to support conservative Republicans.

But what is even more noteworthy is that there were TWO commercials actually made – the aforementioned one narrated by Julia Roberts – and a second one, narrated by George Clooney, that urged men concerned about the fate of the women in their lives under Old Nag Rules, to secretly vote for Harris.

To date there has been zero national uproar about Mr. Clooney urging guys to do what they must do.  But plenty of belly-aching about the chutzpah of Ms. Roberts telling women to go against their husbands’ beliefs, much less keep it from them.

Isn’t that interesting??

Boy, are all those guys, the charter members of Club Nag de Olde, in for a surprise this week.  And for the next four years.

Or, hopefully, eight.

Saturday Night Light – Pre-Election Cold Open (11/2/24)

P.S. – And if you haven’t — #VOTE.

Wolfs in Sheep’s Clothing

This week I watched attempts by both J.D. Vance and George Clooney to charm their way through inferior material and ultimately both failed miserably. 

The Chair comin’ in hot!

Which only goes to show that whether it’s faux Republican schtick or tired Democratic schtick some of us viewers can still spot a con a mile away.

In his new-ish Apple movie, Wolfs, Mr. Clooney – with support from his buddy Brad Pitt – plays a handsome, slick, near infallible fixer. The type of guy you turn to when you have to dispose of a dead body, clean up a crime scene or drive backwards to safety in the middle of the night.

Is it bothering anyone else that it should be Wolves?? #justme

But it’s really a variation of the handsome, slick, near infallible, criminal mastermind Mr. Clooney first brought us almost a quarter century ago in the theatrical blockbuster Ocean’s Eleven (2001), which he then repeated in Ocean’s Twelve (2004), and then repeated again in Ocean’s Thirteen (2007).

Which are all a reboot, remake , rip-off or contemporary, cultural reappropriation (Note: You choose) of the original Ocean’s 11 (1960) starring Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin and Sammy Davis, Jr. aka The Rat Pack, aka the George Clooney and Brad Pitt of their times.

Okay, perhaps the above sarcasm is a bit much. Or is it?

I’ll let you decide

See, the original Ocean’s was merely a goof of a film that packaged the kind of slick, easy, tongue-in-cheek late 50s style boys club humor the Rat Pack stars were known for by employing their larger-than-life celebrity personas on the big screen.

Almost two and a half decades ago it was sort of fun to have Clooney lead a gold star class of turn-of-the-21st-century movie stars of the time (Note: Pitt, Julia Roberts, Matt Damon) mug their way through fantasy, high stakes mischief.  But after milking the buddy-buddy, wink-wink style and tone in so many various ways over so many years and in so many other films in addition to the Oceans franchise, its repackaging on steroids into Wolfs feels a bit cheap and threadbare, despite its rumored $200 million budget. 

Yeah, it’s a little like this

Both Clooney and the movie ultimately come across like a well-wrapped last-minute re-regifting on Christmas morning.  Once you unwrap the pretty paper what you get inside ultimately makes little sense and shows a profound lack of imagination on the part of the person who gave it to you.  Something that, with a modicum of effort, they figured they could get away with.

The Chair again with the hot tea

One could ultimately say the same of JD Vance’s performance in the Vice Presidential debate as he tried to deftly repackage Donald Trump (Note: AKA his running mate and now forever #1) policies on steroids by way of Project 2025, all the while denying their intent and lying about his past and their existence.  His was an upside-down Alice in Wonderland world view, where he denied he did not want to ban abortion nationwide (Note: He is literally on audio and video saying the opposite multiple times), proclaims Mr. Trump tried to save Obamacare (Note: We literally saw John McCain vote that thumbs down years ago and have actual tweets of Trump whining about it) and simply lied about things like illegal immigrants stealing away jobs from American workers.  Fact check here.

Here, demonstrating his distance from the truth

This was all fueled by his delivery – a faux sincere Christ-like quality of benevolence and respect for everyone, most especially Democratic VP nominee Tim Walz, when he’s in the past and near present referred to unmarried American women as “unhappy, childless cat ladies,” his own running mate as “America’s Hitler” and called Mr. Walz’s 24 years in the National Guard, where he trained soldiers to use weapons of war, “stolen valor garbage.”

On the surface, which is where he lived in those 90 minutes, Mr. Vance proved himself to be a slick, silver-tongued debater, much in the same way Mr. Clooney’s characters were slick fixers and silver-tongued uber-thieves.  But once you get below the glossy surfaces the shiny masks give way to the real truth underneath.

Ahhhhhh!

For Vance it was when at the end of the debate, Mr. Walz point blank asked him whether Trump (Note: Indeed a former president, despite how much I loathe writing and admitting that) had actually lost his re-election bid to Joe Biden in 2020.  Clearly fearing the Wrath of Trump, or Sauron or Kahn, or even Gollum, Vance refused to say yes and tried to change the subject.  At which point Coach Walz, the everyman of us all, proclaimed directly to the camera (nee US), that was:

A damning non-answer.

Reality did not happen. 

an evergreen gif

Yet even after almost four years of a Biden presidency and dozens of victorious court cases, many decided by Republican judges who unanimously ruled against Trump and confirmed Mr. Biden’s win, Vance nevertheless continued to claim, there were “problems” with the election.

 The principal one being Mr. Trump could not get his controversial little hands on the Oval Office for a second term. – The Chair

Kaboom

You would think Mr. Clooney – who seems to take humble brag satisfaction at helping to successfully oust Mr. Biden from his bid for re-election in early July in a scathing NY Times editorial that went viral – would have not reveled in inertia but instead chosen a newer, more substantial and far less shiny piece of work to put before the American public than the unsatisfying shaggy dog story of Wolves Wolfs.

A mere three months ago, citing Mr. Biden’s age, he definitively and absolutely proclaimed, perhaps due to what he saw through his magical crystal ball, that “we (Democrats) are not going to win with this president” if we allowed Mr. Biden to try to play the same role in our body politic once again.

Profound as that may seem in hindsight, it’s essential to also know his forecast didn’t end there.  Instead he advised we figure it all out at a messy Democratic convention, where a GROUP of…strong Democrats stand and tell us why they’re best qualified to lead this country.

Because that would have totally worked right?

Never mind the first female, first woman of color Vice President going from the #2 to the #1 role.

Nothing new about that.  We need to shake things up.  Even more.

So easy to say when it’s not you who is being forced to step aside, tell the truth or reinvent.

Barbra Streisand – “Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf”