American Exceptionalism

If you want to see any real life examples of the above, look no further than the actions of one gold medal-winning American ice skater at this year’s winter Olympics. 

Because you won’t find them in the turdly pronouncements from the occupant-in-chief of our freshly minted gold gilded White House.

A rare moment of checks and balances

Twenty-one year old Ilia Malinin, dubbed the skating world’s Quad God, aka the first athlete on Earth to rotate four and a half times in the air on ice skates dozens and dozens of times competitively, helped lead the Americans to an overall team gold medal in ice skating.

That was because when asked at the last minute he agreed to skate his long-form solo program as a key component in the American team event, and save them from an anticipated loss, rather than rest up and wait for his solo competition a handful of days later where he could simply have employed it all for his own glory.

Ilia Malinin's stunning free skate secures US figure skating team gold at  Milan Cortina Olympics - Anchorage Daily News
USA Team Golden Boy

The result was young Mr. Malinin helped win Gold for the team but was unable to duplicate that same stellar performance in his Olympic solo debut, where he stumbled badly and landed in eight place.

Yet unlike what we hear daily from the Oval Office of Outrage there were no excuses, no blame game (Note: Unless blaming himself counts) and no accusation of a rigged voting system that gave an unfair advantage to his opponents.

In fact, after hearing his disappointing score the first thing the much favored 21-year-old did was to march directly over to his competitor and now new gold medal winner, Mikhail Shaidorov of Kazakhstan, and embrace him in a long hug.

Where he could be heard telling him: You deserve it.

Wait What GIFs | Tenor
Integrity? What?!

It’s been quite a long time since we’ve heard any sort of admission of loss, much less an admission of blame, from the upper echelons of the American political or business elite.

Somehow it’s become okay for a small group of uber billionaires, led by the tech bro class of MAGA friendly contributors like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Larry Ellison, to hold more wealth than the bottom 50% of American households – aka over 170 million people.

Sickening GIFs | Tenor
Barf

Not to begrudge anyone the fruits of their labor (Note: Fruits that are enabled through the perks of living in a democracy where they are free to think of the rest of us as mere nuisance shareholders) but that means they control more than 31% of the wealth in the entire U.S, a wealth that has increased 21% (Note: AKA $8.1 billion) in the year since the Golden King of MAGA took office.

Speaking of which, when the massive tariffs he was doling out randomly, and at his whimsy, to countries all over the world, were deemed constitutionally illegal this week in a rare rebuke to him from the far right leaning majority in the U.S. Supreme Court, there were no hugs.

Nor was there any respect from him for the rules, decorum and otherwise, or the judges.

Dramatic Baby Reactions Make You LOL 2026 🤣 Try Not To Laugh Challenge!
Perfect representation of POTUS reaction

Instead, there were proclamations that instead of tariffing specific countries he would try and stretch his presidential powers and go around the ruling by issuing a blanket 15% world tariff to everyone country in the world (Note: The latter edict can last only 150 days, unless extended by Congress).

But most notably there were also the insults and invectives from the soon-to-be 80-year-old squatter in our White House Executive Residence, which he has become known for. 

Calling the judges who voted against his wishes “a disgrace to their families” and “an embarrassment to the nation.”  Accusing them of being “very unpatriotic and disloyal to our constitution.”

This x 1000

And this was a continuance of an invective of insults he tweeted in the months running up to the decision. Speaking in November of those who opposed his tariff policies, which have cost the average American household $1000-$1300 on imported goods last year, he wrote on his personal platform, Truth Social:

Evil, American hating Forces are fighting us at the United States Supreme Court…. Pray to God that our Nine Justices will show great wisdom, and do the right thing for America!

Well, I suppose you could say that is an exceptional statement because when you use exceptional as an adjective it means unusual or not typical.  Also, if you consider the entirety of American presidents, that statement is both not typical AND unusual.

Bernie Sanders . This Is Not Normal GIF | GIFDB.com
Yes Bernie, we know

But American exceptionalism, thought to be first coined by the French historian Alexis de Tocqueville in relation to the U.S, was originally centered around the idea that this country was unique because it was not centered on a ruling class or elite but rather aspired to rights of freedom and liberty for all laid out in its founding documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

Yet as time and centuries evolved the term began to evolve into something it was never intended to mean.  Something that does not at all apply to what made our country exceptional, nor what others deemed exceptional about it to begin with.

Typical GIFs | Tenor
nuff said

From the dreadful 1980s until now, the phrase was somehow co-opted, nee appropriated, by American right wing politicians and leading members of the modern Republican Party as a way to own patriotism and assert their position as THE keepers of MORALITY in the U.S. 

America is THE most freedom-loving, THE least corrupt and THE great example of the moral high ground the world has ever seen.  Especially those Americans who are church-going, conservative, and married with children.

Case closed.  And no arguments.  Especially these days.

Fingers In Ears GIFs | Tenor
la la la la la la

That was the mantra as I all too clearly heard it as far back as the Reagan era and its only become more cemented in stone as the decades have worn on.

In fact, former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, a guy who cheated on his first and second wives, the latter when she was suffering from a brain tumor, even wrote a book in  2012 called, A Nation Like No Other: Why American Exceptionalism Matters, where among other things he argues that one of the reasons we’re so great is our rights are granted by God, not the government.

This would, of course, be news to the Founding Fathers, who purposely left direct references to God out of the U.S. Constitution in order to enshrine the country as one with a secular, non-theocratic government.

Hamilton Musical GIFs - Find & Share on GIPHY
You know.. these guys

And news to France, which gifted the Statue of Liberty to the country with the greatest melting pot of immigration in the world – the United States – in 1884.

And to poet Emma Lazarus, who was asked at a fundraising event that year to donate a poem that could be engraved on its base.  At the time she had been working to aid refugees in New York who had fled antisemitic pogroms in Eastern Europe (Note: My ancestors).  So she came up with the sonnet, The New Colossus, and the now famous lines that have welcomed all immigrants who passed through the New York Harbor by boat, or symbolically by other means, for the last 150 years.

Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

One shudders at the misplaced irony of those words in our current calendar year.

And in the previous one.

It can always get worse

Though not so coincidentally, Ilia Malinin’s parents are both immigrants  Yup. Skating couple Tatiana Malinina and Roman Skorniakov, from Uzbekistan and Russia, respectively.  They were world class competitors who immigrated to the U.S. for a better life and became coaches at an elite ice skating club in Virginia.

It is there that Ilia, a first generation American was born, educated and learned not only his sport but sportsmanship that made him a world class leader of team America.  Not only in the moments he won but for the way he acted when not EVERYTHING went his way.

(will not make Heated Rivalry joke even though I want to)

That was not only exceptional but the true definition of American exceptionalism.

Or it should be.

Watch ILIA MALININ cinch gold here

Forward Backward Thinking

The many fans of writer extraordinaire Aaron Sorkin’s TV fantasy of the presidency, The West Wing, were able to luxuriate in nostalgia this week.

Simpler times

In support of Michelle Obama’s When We All Vote, a non-partisan (Note: Ahem) organization that seeks to encourage voting in groups that too often sit out elections (e.g. young people, communities of color), HBO Max presented a staged reading, with the original cast, of Sorkin’s favorite WW episode — season 3’s Hartfield’s Landing.

This is where senior White House staff obsess about what the first reported presidential primary vote will be in a fictional 48-person New Hampshire town.  After all, the results will dominate the news all day and, if it goes well for the POTUS, it will set a positive tone for all the hoped for favorable press their boss will receive.

LOL remember when there was no news?

And, as we all now know, there is nothing more urgent than setting an upbeat tone in order to win the White House.  Right?

Well, history turns on a dime and what seemed urgent in 2002 and then became just plain silly in light of 2016 could easily, once again, become necessary in 2020.  Right?

Right Jon, right???

Sure!  As I explained to my students this week online via Zoom, because there’s been a deadly pandemic going on for the last eight months and we couldn’t possibly all be in the same room or breathe the same air, history swings like a pendulum – from left to right and back again.

To which one of them blurted out:

So,  when IS it going to swing back?

Yikes, good question #teachablemoment?

I, of course, immediately blurted back that they had to go out to the streets and, while safely socially distanced, swing it back the way they wanted.  Until I realized this was not only likely impossible but sounded like a Grade C imitation of the response Sorkin himself would give. 

Nor do I even believe it in the darker days of 2020.  Which, I confess, is most all of them.

Still, when you live in a purported democracy that’s about all you have, isn’t it?   It’s really just in how inspiring a way you can express it. 

Like a bad haircut, maybe it just needs time.

Well, Mr. Sorkin’s once again done an excellent job on that score as both writer and director in his latest film, The Trial of the Chicago 7. (Note…. the segue).

Dropping on Netflix just one day after the gauzy West Wing redux, his new Netflix offering (Note:  Because, well, our pandemic politics has shuttered most movie theatres and shoved this planned major theatrical release from Paramount right into your home stream) is anything but delicate.

Instead, it’s a theatrically cynical look back into history when the U.S. government was intent on using politics and every piece of the legal system, whether illegally or not, to punish and jail those who dare to take their protests onto the streets.

Look back? Who’s gonna tell him?

Side Note:  It seems particularly fitting it dropped after a week of Senate hearings aimed at putting arch Conservative (and self-possessed handmaid) Judge Amy Coney Barrett on the US Supreme Court.  When asked this week by a Republican senator to name the five freedoms the Bill or Rights guarantees for all Americans, Ms. Barrett could only think of four – freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press and freedom of assembly.

The one freedom that stumped her?

The right to petition the government for redress of grievances, OR, freedom to protest.

And there was laundry talk!

Fittingly enough, the clairvoyant Mr. Sorkin’s new legal drama takes us back in time to the late sixties, when this very issue was very, very VERY publicly spotlighted.  This was a time when the federal government, newly controlled by the uber conservative and freedom of protest loathing Richard Nixon, decided to charge a group of young and somewhat renowned and popular anti- Vietnam War protestors for conspiracy and crossing state lines with the intent to incite riots at the site of the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago.

Your next Netflix watch

Take the antics of this cross-section of long and short-haired, hippie and preppy, respectful and comically stoned and disrespectful young people – and mix it with a real-life first amendment-hating and often blatantly racist judge tasked with carrying out those charges by newly installed and diabolically fascist federally empowered Nixon flunkies and, well, you can see where hilarity and mass national conflicts could ensue.

And where the comparable present-day hyperbole might begin.

It’s not a particularly pretty story to look back on, even with the much hoped for and very pithily delivered Sorkin bon mots.  But even if you don’t love Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat movies or his borderline irredeemable prankster antics, you couldn’t experience anyone better portraying the late Yippie leader Abbie Hoffman, who famously feasted on yanking the chain of the establishment and even of his co-defendant Tom Hayden, the more straight-laced founder of Students for a Democratic Society so well evoked by Eddie Redmayne.

Also big hair moment

Ditto for so many others, including Frank Langella’s racist persecutor/Judge Hoffman, whose shared last name with Abbie is an ongoing joke, as well as a brief but memorable appearance by Michael Keaton as Ramsey Clarke, the much more liberal former attorney general from the previous Johnson administration.

It is the shifting of the pendulum of justice between left and right, liberal and conservative, and everything in between that gives the story of this Trial of the Chicago 7 its present day resonance.  At least for those of us hoping that this Election Day is about to once again cause a major shift back to what we used to think of as American sanity.

This. This. This. This. #VOTE

Yet at the same time it’s also this very issue that makes this movie inescapably scary.  As one watches the absolute conviction a single judge, backed by a new presidential administration, has towards enforcing racist and regressive views, and notes how willing both are to twist or even ignore the very laws it’s charged with enforcing in order to permanently silence those who oppose them, one can’t help but wonder — how many times CAN the pendulum shift back and forth before it all together cracks apart?

Sorkin’s courtroom antics and filmmaking dexterity do a great job of zeroing in on the core issues at stake and give us a happy ending from five decades ago that ensures American democracy will continue.

But this week’s US Supreme Court hearing, the one that will very likely (and somewhat dubiously) enshrine perhaps the most conservative judge in American history onto OUR Supreme Court, combined with the challenge for the umpteenth time of once again shifting the American presidency away from, well, fascism (Note: Fascism being the kind word), is a very steep, real life, hill to climb. 

Holding on tight to that last shred of hope

Especially in the middle of a global pandemic.

Where our ability, and even right to vote as we can, is being challenged at every turn.

Sorkin has written and imagined the way forward for us by going back in time.  But we now have to figure how to carry it out.

Another pat answer from me that borders on the cliché. 

Still, life’s never been quite as efficient, or satisfying, as any one Sorkin movie or TV series, much as we all (Note:  Well, the majority of us), would like to continue to pretend it to be.

Bob Marley – “Get Up Stand Up”