Imagine What?

In the last few weeks more than a handful of friends, family and acquaintances have told me in many different ways that they could never have imagined what passes for politics and news in the U.S. these days.

As is usual for these types of conversations, talk kept going back to the former US president, meaning the guy before Joe Biden, and the deviously gluttonous way in which he manages to devour everything and everyone in his path.

Now and forever

How is it that this happened???…they all eventually ask in various forms.

I know it’s important but if I hear one more word about Him, I’m going to scream… so many confess while simultaneously admitting they find themselves tuning out the news.

Every single day I wish he was dead.

Why doesn’t he just have a heart attack and die? 

I’ve gone to the bad place

The fury of those last thoughts often come with an apology for wishing or even imagining them.

Until I interrupt and confess I feel exactly the same way.

But more so. 

At which point I mention all of the ingenious ways that my imagination manages to… well, you know.

When they beg me to elaborate I mostly decline. 

Give in to the dark side

Though I must admit a few of them are so good that they scare even me.  And, after a particularly heinous news day…

Make me smile.

But see, that’s the thing with imagination.  It’s an incredible balm to the soul.  If you allow yourself to think it up, it can feel real. 

It doesn’t have to be real.  But it can help you think and process your innermost desires and demons and other stuff that you can’t quite yet categorize and comes from who knows where.

Or it can simply get it out of your head.  Maybe never to be heard from again but perhaps to be sorted out.

uh oh, we’ve entered the slippery slope

I’m a writer so I often write it down.  And very occasionally, but not often enough, it spawns a good idea for a script or story of some kind.  Or a new way to think about an old story I’ve been telling myself for years – either on paper, or in everyday life, or way, way in the past.

This weekend a good friend invited me to a filmed play of what was billed as a radical new version of Anton Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya.

And playing ALL EIGHT PARTS in this retelling of a 125-plus-year-old Chekhov story was none other than the actor Andrew Scott.

Netflix’s Ripley. 

The tortured gay heartthrob from last year’s All Of Us Strangers. 

The hot priest from Fleabag. 

Moriarity from the long-running BBC series Sherlock.

Among others.

Does this man age??

You watch this guy nimbly jumping back and forth from one character to another, sometimes in mere seconds and other times in minutes, or monologues, as he quips, cajoles, argues, eats and occasionally even, with the use of his hands, shoulder, neck and breath, simultaneously portray two different male and female characters making love to each other, and all you can think about initially is….

How????? 

How is this possible?  How is he able to do this? 

And then… who imagined it?

All of these emotions

Well, it was adapted last year by the playwright Simon Stephens, who a decade ago theatrically shed light on and likely helped change the way we thought about autism in the groundbreaking play The Curious Incident of the Dog In The Night-Time (Note: Adapted from the novel by Mark Haddon, it’s won most major playwriting awards). 

And he is billed as co-creating it with both Scott and Sam Yates, a 40ish British stage and sometimes television and film director known for his unusual approach to both new and classical material.

Okay.

But then you ask yourself…

Why?????  Why do this?

Why do we need this?  Why do it at all? 

::Throws hands up::

Well, because someone, or a handful of ones, thought of it and needed to think of it.  Something about the world they lived in, or events they were personally experiencing, prompted them to think of it.  And then move forward with recreating something (and a bunch of fictional someones) from the past that would allow them to understand their present in a different way.

It’s not as if before seeing this filmed version of a play done last year at the National Theatre I was excited about seeing Uncle Vanya done as a one-man show.

Or frankly, any production of Uncle Vanya at all.  Nor, I venture to say, is the average person.

Preach it, Chairy

But watching Mr. Scott (Note: I so want to call him Andrew, or even Andy)… okay Andrew… throw himself so fully into instantly becoming so many people – with no wigs, no costumes, only a trajectory of mangled feelings, conflicts and eventually emotional outcomes, denials and realizations – well, it was about as contemporary as it gets for me.

It seemed that this film, of this play, had nothing at all to do with Uncle Vanya, or even the playwright himself. 

What it addressed were the myriad of emotions, sometimes life and death ones, we are ALL trying to manage as best we can these days.  Only to be shown there is no managing. 

See above

There is only being truthful about how and what we feel, taking the actions we believe fitting and holding out some hope for a better future when they don’t work out. 

And, well, to keep trying.

It might sound a bit trite, but that’s what this new version of Vanya, the one I didn’t think I needed but some other people imagined I might need, did for me.

We love an ah-ha moment

It made me realize once again that navigating what we call the politics of today is not much different for our generation than it ever was.

And that, lucky for us, back then Chekhov was quite an imaginative fellow himself.

The Temptations – “Just My Imagination”

Barbenheimer Whiplash

Now that Barbie has sold more than ONE BILLION dollars of tickets at the box office worldwide and our beloved Greta Gerwig has become the #1 commercial female director in movie history, it’s time for the complaints.

We’ve been waiting!

Oh, but wait.

Now that Oppenheimer has sold more than $600 million dollars of tickets at the box office worldwide and proven there is no ceiling to how popular, acclaimed and profitable THREE HOURS of dark, dramatic filmmaking can be, it’s time to eviscerate Christopher Nolan and IT into the cinematic equivalent of swiss cheese.

Boo hoo, right?

Bring. It. On.

I know.

Nevertheless, this is why we can’t have nice things.

As life goes on you get to the point where you not only realize you can’t please everyone, but that you really don’t give a sh-t and stop trying.

In reality, the only person you can actually please is yourself. 

And even that is unlikely.

Harumphhhh.

Especially when you are doing something artistic.

Actually, the arts are no different than life in that regard so let’s amend that thought to include everything.  When you try to be (or do or create) all things to all people you wind up with not much of anything worth spending time with.

I tell writing students that it doesn’t matter if a subject they write about has been done before because:

a. Everything (and everyone) has been done before, and

b. If you dig deep and tell the story in a personal (Note: But necessarily autobiographical) enough way, it can’t help but be original because no one has exactly your take on the world (Note: Clones, accepted).

Awww shucks

It only took me decades of therapy to get to this point but here I am preaching what the most truly evolved of us knew far earlier in life. 

Still, better late than never.

I was a movie critic at Variety for many years, many decades ago, and the most astute remark I ever heard about critics came from my colleague Jim Harwood, a really smart guy who sat at a desk to the left of me and used to write for the Wall Street Journal before covering show business and writing short clever columns about people like Ted Turner and Kirk Kerkorian long before that was popular.

When someone asked him once what qualified him to be a critic, he turned tartly to them and without missing a beat, said:

Because I have an opinion and a place to print it.

I said, what I said

Now, of course, EVERYONE does.

Including me.

God (Note: Or whoever you imagine Her to be) help us all.

See, what Harwood, as we all called him, got before any of us and is worth reminding all of us of at this moment, is that critical thought is nice but it’s not an absolute and there isn’t a right or wrong.

There’s simply an opinion.      

Exactly

There are a lot of boys (Note: Well, adult males acting like little boys) up in arms about what they perceive as the small-mindedness in which they are ALL being portrayed in a film about a doll. 

Just as there are lots of conservatives foaming at the mouth that a short sequence where little girls toss aside their Betsy Wetsy-like infant dolls in favor of a hip, curvaceous, fashion -forward plastic version of young women, means motherhood is in peril and the very future of society as we know it is being put at risk.

Oh.  My. Goddess.

eyeroll of the century

The complaints about what was going on in the mind of the genius man who supervised the invention of the first nuclear bomb and enabled it’s launching is a bit more complicated but nevertheless operates on the same principle.

Choosing to show a genius of the 1930s, 40s and 50s working in a boy’s club of mostly men (Note: Despite the fact that far less than 5% of the scientists working with him at Los Alamos were women) must mean that the filmmaker, not the math genius, ignores (nee marginalizes) women.   And the idea that the two primary sexual partners shown in his life were a female biologist and a female psychiatrist is further proof that the guy who made this movie can only see women as his own personal sexual receptacles. 

um… hmmm… uh… well…

Worse yet, is the clear racism employed by not showing re-recreated or existing documentary footage of the actual atomic bomb going off at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and getting to literally view the faces of tens of thousands of Japanese people being ripped away. 

That couldn’t be an artistic choice to center the film on the man’s existential crisis of good vs. evil and not the literal enormity of the bomb.  It can only be the means by which one gets to negate every achievement that came before it and dismiss the film, in its entirety, as a relic of storytelling of the white male privilege kind.

Well, I mean, Chris Nolan IS a white guy who is a bit of a genius just as Greta Gerwig IS a feminist with a passion for the color pink and cheeky comic irony.

What else could, or SHOULD, their movies be???

help!!

Oh, OF COURSE I get the complaints and where they’re coming from.

I’m not a TOTAL moron.  (Note: Even though it might be easier to dismiss me as such.)

But to accuse the films as either a whitewashing of history or a too woke view of men and/or women-hood is truly a bit reductive.

I was tempted to use the word self-serving but that would be a putdown to anyone else’s viewpoint, which I don’t seek to do (Note: No matter how tempting).   It’s merely to suggest that no one work or person or place can be 100% inclusive of everything and/or everyone.

Sorry?

And even if they could, guaranteed a bunch of the rest of us wouldn’t like the result of that either.

So instead, here’s a thought: 

If you don’t like what’s out there – do your own film.  Or, get a group of friends together who think like you do and have them do it. 

Or write it.  Or sing about it.  Or paint it.  Or rhyme it in couplets.

And then disregard anything I, or the world, has to say.  Especially if other people, but most importantly you, like it.

Billie Eilish – “What Was I Made For?” (from Barbie)