The Dreaded Third Act

I decided this week that we have not reached the third act of Donald Trump but, rather, America’s third act with or without…HIM.  After all, it’s ultimately all of US who are the main character in this tawdry story and whose fates hang in the balance.  We’ve got the most at stake and we’re the downtrodden potential hero any reasonable audience will be rooting for.

So….I decided to consult an expert.   

Time for research!

Screen and television writer-producer Tony McNamara (Poor Things, The Great) recently wrote a piece for the L.A. Times where he likened the writer’s experience of writing a screenplay, especially its third act, to the three-act structure journey we usually send our main character (Note: They used to call them heroes in the old days, but Donald has forever ruined that) on in our movies. 

And since McNamara used his experience writing the crazy, bold and currently Oscar-nominated adapted screenplay for Poor Things, a film that under most circumstances would never get made, much less released, by a major Hollywood studio (Note: Nor certainly in a country ruled by an aspiring dictator) as a metaphor, I figured what he had to say was noteworthy.

Ready for it!

Here’s how he sees it:

The first act is the writers’ setup and then acceptance and commitment to take on the daunting task of telling – and actually agreeing to write – the story. 

In McNamara’s case this was particularly daunting since Poor Things was based on a Scottish novel and he had never adapted a screenplay from a book, much less one set in Victorian London, that was both “a gothic comedy fantasy and a philosophical satire about shame” centered on a woman (Bella Baxter) who is “reanimated to life when her own baby’s brain is put into her head.”

This may explain why she is always looking surprised

Nevertheless, we screenwriters tend to be nothing else if not game, much in the way many of we Americans used to be in our not-so-distant pasts. (Note: See the 1960s and/or 1970s for examples).

The second act, according to McNamara, is the actual writing process – meaning facing all the obstacles, challenges and conflicts set up along the way for our characters during the process of writing them, and solving them cleverly, dramatically and even with some outrageous humor.

No need to go into details of what he had to do with his screenplay here, except to say that, like most history, Bella’s narrative in the novel was told, and thus controlled, by the men in her life.  It was their version of her story with them, taking place in their world. 

You know… like him

So the decision was made that the movie “story” would instead focus on Bella’s journey of growth and discovery, as well as the failure of traditional society (e.g. men) to control her.  It took the whole project in a new and exciting direction, moving McNamara quickly through much of the scenes he had planned up to that familiar moment in almost every movie, and in many a writers’ nightmare, when a hero/heroine/society’s dream turns to crap and they, and their writer, are faced with –

The dreaded third act. 

noooooo

That point where the writer, and the movie, must pick up their main character (Note: Or even country, if it aspires to be heroic) out of the gutter, figure out a believable solution to the problem at hand, and then come up with a plan of action which will lead to a solution that will resolve the story in a true, believable and somewhat satisfying (though not necessarily happy for everyone) way worthy of said character, its people, and the audience (Note: Or citizenry) living and/or viewing it.

What this meant for the third act of Poor Things can be viewed onscreen (Note: No Spoilers here!) and through the accolades and mostly positive attention it has received from filmgoers and critics since its debut at the Venice Film Festival in the fall of 2023.

But know that it wasn’t easy getting there. 

Writers brain

McNamara recalls that at that structural point in his and his film’s journey he was panicked, convinced everything he had planned would happen could now never work, and found himself unable to come up with any solutions. 

At All. 

Nothing.  Nada. 

Except sheer panic.

Eventually, and after much thought about, well, A LOT of things, this prompted him to send an email to the director with the words:

It’s too hard.  We tried.  Let’s never speak of this again.

I quit

And a promise to return all the money he was paid to face, what seemed at the time, an impossible task – yet one that with more time, thought and renewed focus would turn out to be anything but.

Most of the writers I know, myself included, have either lived or lives in fear of the moment McNamara experienced as his third act loomed.  Of course, It doesn’t always happen in that spot. 

For me it’s usually later on, midway through the second draft, where I suddenly begin to hyperventilate, what have I done?, out loud to myself as I slowly begin to realize the whole thing is falling apart. 

OK I haven’t taken it this far… yet

For others it happens at the beginning, when they have to start, or have started, to their dissatisfaction.  Still others have their moment near or at the conclusion, sure every bit of it will not work and that it will mark a real ending for them personally, one they had never anticipated and certainly never intended.

Often it takes the form of a voice that says:

There is NO recovery from this for me. The end is near and there is nothing to be done about it but pack it in, submit to the looming defeat that is about to come and hide in shame until it passes.  Maybe you try to live on, but likely you won’t, certainly not in the way that you have been.

Making a swift exit helps

Well, I can’t help but feel that many voters in America are in a similar panic mode as they face the current end of act two low point of the Trump Era and contemplate his very well-publicized, gasping grab at a victorious third act…For Himself.

So we need to ask ourselves this:

Whose game are we playing?  His?  Or ours?  Whose narrative is this?  Who is the star of this movie – US, or Him?  (Note: Ironically, when asked about films he likes he rejects anything contemporary and often cites Sunset Boulevard (A former star who lives in the past and is going stark raving mad) or Citizen Kane (A bitter mogul whose life ends with him moaning for a toy that gave him one single fleeting moment of childhood happiness he was doomed to never experience again in his adult life).

Today at Mar-a-lago

Hey, I like them too.  But think about it.

Also, think about this. 

There are many other tough, smart Black women willing to follow in NY Attorney General Letitia James’ and Atlanta DA Fani Willis’ footsteps into the white hot national spotlight of scrutiny in order to slay the MAGA dragon and save the country, and in turn, democracy.

But they can’t do it alone. Nor should they have to.

Let’s do this

The least the rest of us can do is stop whining about Trump and wringing our hands over Joe Biden’s age and start publicly opposing the MAGA agenda at every single chance we get – verbally, financially and at the ballot box.

We need to write our own Third Act before the Orange Menace does it for us and determines our Final Solution.

Poor Things dancing scene

Barbenheimer Whiplash

Now that Barbie has sold more than ONE BILLION dollars of tickets at the box office worldwide and our beloved Greta Gerwig has become the #1 commercial female director in movie history, it’s time for the complaints.

We’ve been waiting!

Oh, but wait.

Now that Oppenheimer has sold more than $600 million dollars of tickets at the box office worldwide and proven there is no ceiling to how popular, acclaimed and profitable THREE HOURS of dark, dramatic filmmaking can be, it’s time to eviscerate Christopher Nolan and IT into the cinematic equivalent of swiss cheese.

Boo hoo, right?

Bring. It. On.

I know.

Nevertheless, this is why we can’t have nice things.

As life goes on you get to the point where you not only realize you can’t please everyone, but that you really don’t give a sh-t and stop trying.

In reality, the only person you can actually please is yourself. 

And even that is unlikely.

Harumphhhh.

Especially when you are doing something artistic.

Actually, the arts are no different than life in that regard so let’s amend that thought to include everything.  When you try to be (or do or create) all things to all people you wind up with not much of anything worth spending time with.

I tell writing students that it doesn’t matter if a subject they write about has been done before because:

a. Everything (and everyone) has been done before, and

b. If you dig deep and tell the story in a personal (Note: But necessarily autobiographical) enough way, it can’t help but be original because no one has exactly your take on the world (Note: Clones, accepted).

Awww shucks

It only took me decades of therapy to get to this point but here I am preaching what the most truly evolved of us knew far earlier in life. 

Still, better late than never.

I was a movie critic at Variety for many years, many decades ago, and the most astute remark I ever heard about critics came from my colleague Jim Harwood, a really smart guy who sat at a desk to the left of me and used to write for the Wall Street Journal before covering show business and writing short clever columns about people like Ted Turner and Kirk Kerkorian long before that was popular.

When someone asked him once what qualified him to be a critic, he turned tartly to them and without missing a beat, said:

Because I have an opinion and a place to print it.

I said, what I said

Now, of course, EVERYONE does.

Including me.

God (Note: Or whoever you imagine Her to be) help us all.

See, what Harwood, as we all called him, got before any of us and is worth reminding all of us of at this moment, is that critical thought is nice but it’s not an absolute and there isn’t a right or wrong.

There’s simply an opinion.      

Exactly

There are a lot of boys (Note: Well, adult males acting like little boys) up in arms about what they perceive as the small-mindedness in which they are ALL being portrayed in a film about a doll. 

Just as there are lots of conservatives foaming at the mouth that a short sequence where little girls toss aside their Betsy Wetsy-like infant dolls in favor of a hip, curvaceous, fashion -forward plastic version of young women, means motherhood is in peril and the very future of society as we know it is being put at risk.

Oh.  My. Goddess.

eyeroll of the century

The complaints about what was going on in the mind of the genius man who supervised the invention of the first nuclear bomb and enabled it’s launching is a bit more complicated but nevertheless operates on the same principle.

Choosing to show a genius of the 1930s, 40s and 50s working in a boy’s club of mostly men (Note: Despite the fact that far less than 5% of the scientists working with him at Los Alamos were women) must mean that the filmmaker, not the math genius, ignores (nee marginalizes) women.   And the idea that the two primary sexual partners shown in his life were a female biologist and a female psychiatrist is further proof that the guy who made this movie can only see women as his own personal sexual receptacles. 

um… hmmm… uh… well…

Worse yet, is the clear racism employed by not showing re-recreated or existing documentary footage of the actual atomic bomb going off at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and getting to literally view the faces of tens of thousands of Japanese people being ripped away. 

That couldn’t be an artistic choice to center the film on the man’s existential crisis of good vs. evil and not the literal enormity of the bomb.  It can only be the means by which one gets to negate every achievement that came before it and dismiss the film, in its entirety, as a relic of storytelling of the white male privilege kind.

Well, I mean, Chris Nolan IS a white guy who is a bit of a genius just as Greta Gerwig IS a feminist with a passion for the color pink and cheeky comic irony.

What else could, or SHOULD, their movies be???

help!!

Oh, OF COURSE I get the complaints and where they’re coming from.

I’m not a TOTAL moron.  (Note: Even though it might be easier to dismiss me as such.)

But to accuse the films as either a whitewashing of history or a too woke view of men and/or women-hood is truly a bit reductive.

I was tempted to use the word self-serving but that would be a putdown to anyone else’s viewpoint, which I don’t seek to do (Note: No matter how tempting).   It’s merely to suggest that no one work or person or place can be 100% inclusive of everything and/or everyone.

Sorry?

And even if they could, guaranteed a bunch of the rest of us wouldn’t like the result of that either.

So instead, here’s a thought: 

If you don’t like what’s out there – do your own film.  Or, get a group of friends together who think like you do and have them do it. 

Or write it.  Or sing about it.  Or paint it.  Or rhyme it in couplets.

And then disregard anything I, or the world, has to say.  Especially if other people, but most importantly you, like it.

Billie Eilish – “What Was I Made For?” (from Barbie)