The Games People Play

Here’s what I posted on various social media sites on Thursday just to keep me sane:

Pres. Biden could cure cancer and solve climate change & all anyone would focus on is the fact that he mispronounced the words “tumor” and “temperature.” #BidenHarris2024

AMEN

It’s not much but I had to do something in the moment to make me feel like I wasn’t going crazy.

Plus, it was kind of funny.  At least to me.  Because it’s kind of true. 

I’m going to try to keep this brief but let me confess the following:

I don’t have many areas of interest where I have both expertise and work experience but two of them are the entertainment industry and journalism. 

And both of them polluted the atmosphere with all kinds of horseshit this week.

Yeah, I said it.

Horseshit.

Jurassic levels

And in a blatantly insincere way, which somehow makes it worse.  I mean, if you’re going to try to sell people a load of crap at least be a little better at it. 

I’m talking to you George Clooney, a dozen plus Democratic House members, a couple of governors and a senator.

We were all spooked by the president’s poor debate performance, his dip in the polls against Trump and the fact that he’s still jumbling some names and phrases here and there.

Yes, it’s frustrating, but this isn’t helping

But anyone paying attention to the facts in the last few days also knows a few other things. 

  1. A rested Biden gave a master class in foreign policy and domestic issues in a live, unscripted internationally televised press conference on Thursday.
  • An on-fire (Note: In a good way) Biden electrified a crowd in Detroit Friday afternoon, setting forth not only what he plans to do in the first 90 days of his second term but eviscerating (Note: And the Chair knows from eviscerating) Trump’s immorality, criminality and draconian Project 2025 plan for his MAGA fantasy second go round in the White House.  #BuckleUp.
  • Biden and Trump are now STATISTICALLY TIED on average in the national polls.  They are each ahead in different selected survey averages but neither greater than the 3% margin of error.  AND often there is a difference of just 1 or 2%.  Don’t believe me?  Here, and here.
Listen to Taylor

Re polling – It’s an imperfect science, especially given the failure of the far right to take hold in France or the U.K. in the last few weeks, or to remain in power this year in Poland.  Or to landslide its way to massive victory in the U.S. midterm elections. 

ALL of which MANY polls predicted.

So, given ALL of this — WTF??? 

Never knowing how to feel

Look, we all know the undebatable stakes of the 2024 presidential election. 

Democracy vs. Dictatorship. 

Okay, it’d likely be some botched version of a dictatorship because it’s Trump but if he wins A LOT of rights American take for granted will get taken away.

Especially if you’re non-white, poor, female, non-Christian, LGBTQ+ or have the ability to talk back to authority figures in a particularly snide, eviscerating way you find impossible to control in situations you deem to be unfair. 

Visit me

So as someone who fits squarely into the latter three of those six categories and literally rules at the top of the heap in the last one, I understand the concern.

But circling back, I also recognize horseshit when I read it and see it.

George Clooney lives in a ginormous estate in Lake Como, Italy and has accrued tons of money and power, some of which he’s put behind the Democratic party (Note: Good for him). But he is NOT the Democratic Party.  Nor is Rob Reiner.  Nor are the numerous middle-aged men – and yeah, they’re mostly male and mostly straight – who are now determined to get THEIR way and get Biden OFF the ticket because THEY somehow KNOW it’s the RIGHT thing.

You can read Clooney’s editorial for the NY Times if you can get behind its paywall. Or simply read a recap of it on free-as-a-bird Slate.

eyeroll

But basically he uses his huge platform to salute Biden as a hero, tells us he LOVES him and then very completely and very publicly eviscerates (Note: That word AGAIN!) his cognitive abilities to do anything more than… well, I’m not sure he thinks Biden can do ANYTHING at this point.  Most certainly not a one-hour open press conference a few days later or a cogent, rabble-rousing, Trump eviscera… okay – skewering, policy-particular campaign appearance where he is also able to cool down a hot crowd from attacking an intrusive anti-Israeli protestor hellbent on interrupting his speech and simultaneously defend said dissenting voice.

Nevertheless, George says HE’s spoken behind the scenes to many members of Congress, and also governors, and EVERY SINGLE ONE (Note: His words, not mine) thinks Democrats will lose the House, the Senate AND the presidency in November.

Well then – why even have an election? 

Why vote at all?

k bye

Of course he and some others – the others being those now almost two dozen members of Congress, as well as a few governors (Note: The numbers change as I write this) – have a Clooney proposed pie-in-the-sky plan.  Let’s get some of our very “strong Democrats“ on the back “bench” like – Kamala Harris, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, Illinois Gov. J.D. Pritzker, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and “figure this out.”

But, um… isn’t Kamala Harris #2 on the ticket?  So if #1 retires doesn’t that mean #2 moves up?  Or are they suggesting it’s now a jump ball (Note: George loves sports, especially basketball) and may the best PLAYER win because they could out maneuver our first woman of color, duly elected vice-president?   Good plan.

And it’s total absolute unadulterated HORSE S…well, you know what.

Yeah we know

Because what would George do if he were trying to get a movie of his made?  Would he talk directly to the studio and production company heads, negotiate behind the scenes with others and through agents, or even figure out new, creative solutions with his team and their teams to get what he wanted?

Or –

Would he publicly denounce the very people he’s been in business with – VERY publicly IN the press – and knowingly blow up any potential positive outcome for not only THIS DEAL but ALL OTHERS in the future because of all the bridges that HE burned? 

That’s not what he ever does for his movies, or in his career.  So why go down that road now?

How bout that George?

Well, here’s the deal

George wants what he wants.  He thinks HE’S right – because how could he not be – and none of the collateral damage (Note: That would be we voters) matters.  This isn’t how he makes his living and he doesn’t have to do another deal in this arena.  And even if he isn’t that cavalier and is doing it for the betterment of the world – HIS WAY couldn’t possibly be the wrong way.  Because in a movie mindset there is nothing more powerful AND more right than a MOVIE STAR director AND producer.

With elected officials it’s easier.  What they want is to not lose their seats in Congress, their power and their access to future power.  They’re running scared, not unlike many in the Republican party who have enabled Trump, lost their moral compasses and find themselves choking daily on their own hubris in hopes they can survive the next roll call vote.

Amen

None of this is democracy.  It has nothing to do with the voters.  It’s merely a path that will lead us on the road towards Dictatorship Lane.

And the same principal applies to some of the most reputable media outlets determined to devote 50% of their focus to sidelining the Biden of it all.  The New York Times Editorial Board firmly calling on the president to step aside after the debate, knowing it will send the race into a feeding frenzy, and then denouncing Trump two weeks later as totally unqualified for president and a threat to democracy.

Maybe pick a lane in the real world?

Not an option folks!

Unless it’s about hedging bets for access and self-preservation in case the orange nightmare were to take over.

CNN “journalists” hosting a presidential debate with NO fact checking are no better.  Nor is one of those CNN hosts several weeks later for going out of his way to retweet stories on Twiiter/X from other sources roasting Biden’s staff, the candidate and any real prospect of him emerging victorious in winning a second term.  Visit the Twitter/X hellscape and scroll through Jake Tapper’s feed (@jaketapper) and you’ll see what I’m saying.

No thanks

The one public person I do see working for the American people is Joe Biden.  He’s hosted a week-long NATO summit of leaders determined to save the world from an actual dictator, Putin; announced a three-part plan this weekend that could end the war in Gaza; got inflation down another .3% this month despite all the naysayers (Note: Yes, things WILL cost a little less); continues to add more new jobs monthly than almost any president in the last 40 years; and is presiding over record stock market numbers.

Yup, he screws up names, clears his throat A LOT, and occasionally, or maybe even a little too much, gets lost in a sentence.  But as he reminded a crowd Friday night, Trump called Nikki Haley Nancy Pelosi, was convicted of “raping” (Note: The judge’s official word) a woman, and boldly proclaims he will be our “dictator on Day One.” 

We VOTERS – not the pollsters, not the celebrities and certainly not the media – get to decide who wins the 2024 election.

Cheers to THAT

Sure, nothing’s perfect, certainly not this year.

But contrary to popular punditry and electoral strategies, this is real life democracy. 

It’s not a game, it’s not entertainment and it’s certainly not the base reality show that is desperately being shoved down our throats from every which way.

Or is it?

Inner Circle – “Games People Play”

P.S. – So much for me being brief.

The Chair’s Review: Bros

Who knew that Bros, the first gay romantic comedy released by a major studio, would be as good and sweet and touching as it is?

I certainly didn’t.

Oh, also, it’s pretty damn funny.

And Billy Eichner and Luke Macfarlane make a really convincing couple falling in love. 

It might not seem that way in the poster, which features only the backsides of two unidentified men, each with a hand on the other one’s ass.

Isn’t this better???

But, hey, you can’t have everything.

Sadly, one thing Bros didn’t have this opening weekend was box-office success.

It received almost universally glowing reviews and scored 97% on Rotten Tomatoes’ audience meter.  But grossing approximately $4.8 million domestically on 3350 screens makes it a huge financial disappointment in light of the $10 million plus it was expected to earn.

Not to mention the $22 million it cost to make and the $30-$40 million above that Universal Pictures spent to market it. 

Box-office numbers are a strange indicator of what is good, bad or indifferent about a movie.  Trust me, I know whereof I speak.  In the eighties, I started the first weekly national box-office column for Daily Variety, which in turn popularized the international trend of reporting the grosses each weekend as if movies were racehorses in the Kentucky Derby.

Groan

But what seemed a good idea at the time for a business publication inundated with inflated numbers of seeming profit provided by their corporate-entity makers (Note:  There is often little correlation between box-office grosses and actual profit, since it depends how much the damn thing cost to make and promote) promptly became nothing more than another way to measure a film’s VALUE. 

In turn, it too often was the barometer for it being dubbed a SUCCESS or a FAILURE.

Yes, we live in a capitalist society and who doesn’t like making money?  This is especially the case for corporate entities.

But as far as the measure of worth is concerned, the numbers a moviemaker’s film pulls in on opening weekend at the box-office in 2022 couldn’t be less-related to its artistic, and, yeah, even its ultimate financial worth.

Preach!

This is not 1980, when Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder’s bro comedy Stir Crazy was lighting up the box-office coffers in one of the first Daily Variety stories I ever wrote.  And Bros is certainly not Annie Hall (1977), a film about another neurotic Jewish New Yorker who falls in love with a gorgeous person from the planet SHIKSA/SHAYGETZ (Note: Look it up!) much the way Mr. Eichner does here.

As a young gay man who loved Annie Hall when it was released and had not yet come out, I could NEVER have imagined in my WILDEST, WEIRDEST dream that any movie studio, much less a major one, could make a gay male love story starring a much too talkative, know-it-all Semitic boy from Queens, like Billy AND myself, with any other boy boy from any other PLANET.

I mean, I barely realized those kind of love affairs were possible in real life on EARTH.  And you might even substitute the world barely with I didn’t even know. 

If only I had Bros way back when, I might have kissed (Note: And much more) A LOT less toads until I found my prince.

This!

But I suspect that was partly Mr. Eichner’s story too, and at least a sliver of the reason he wanted to make this movie in the first place.  It’s a laudable ambition and effort but practically a fool’s errand given the finicky nature of the way audiences watch new films in these pandemic and post-pandemic (Note: Ahem) days.

Personally, this is only the second time in more than two and a half years I’ve been to an actual public movie theatre as opposed to the at least 1-2 times PER WEEK that I used to attend pre-2020.

Me, 20 minutes before showtime

This might not be the case for most young people but, then again, we need to consider what everyone is now going to see publicly en masse. 

Once you cut out Marvel movies, horror films and tent pole-type action flicks, how many big opening weekends for romantic comedies are left??

Bros director/co-writer Nick Stoller scored big with the pre-pandemic 2008 film Forgetting Sarah Marshall.  And producer Judd Apatow directed the writer-star Amy Schumer to opening weekend success in 2015 in her big screen debut, Trainwreck.

But those might have been made and released a century ago as far as our current movie-watching habits are concerned.

Imagine a world where at least half of the new movies can be had opening weekend at home on your big ass screen with a click of a button from a service you pay a minimal amount of money to subscribe to.

You don’t have to.  It exists.

… and you don’t even need to wear shoes (or get dressed!)

Or better yet, think about a life when any moviegoer can pay the price of a single ticket of admission plus a few more dollars and entertain as large a group of friends as they want to their house (Note: Or even a first date with someone they like) and together watch that new movie they’ve been dying to see, on their computer, in their living room, bedroom or, well, any room in or outside their house, apartment, or trailer home?

You don’t have to.  You can merely open your eyes and fulfill that wish for 80% of the movies out there.

Universal and the other big four or five major studios  (Note:  Six? Seven? Three? How many are technically left?) might not want to recognize this fact.  But it’s still a fact.

This is especially the case for a genre that’s always been close to this gay man’s heart – the romantic comedy.    

On the other hand, maybe I’ll be proved wrong in a few weeks when the new George Clooney-Julia Roberts rom-com, Ticket to Paradise, debuts solely at movie theatres.

Admittedly a better poster!

Yet is it fair to compare movie star royalty like the Clooney-Roberts combined billion-dollar box-office oeuvre with Billy Eichner and Luke Macfarlane?

Well, too bad.  Who ever said life was fair?

See, that’s the gist of the argument.  But the market doesn’t quite exist anymore to launch a new rom-com star, or stars, solely on the big screen.  Even Julia Roberts did a TV series a few years ago and the last theatrical box-office success starring George Clooney was…… okay, Gravity (2013), where he didn’t even have the lead and which was certainly no rom-com.

Bros got the most difficult thing right in a movie of any genre, but most especially one that is a romance AND a comedy.  It persuades us to care about its two leads by presenting them as real people rather than cardboard cutout movie types generated by a computer program, a list of old films and the shuffling of scenes written on a bunch of recycled index cards.

and it’s charming!

Sure, there are moments where what we are watching has so many LGBTQ plus references and people that you need a flow chart to be fluid, up to date, on trend and hip enough not to be left in the dust or mildly uncomfortable by some throwaway remark or too larger than life comic overstep or contemporary reference.

But that’s the exception rather than the rule here. 

Bros is certainly not perfect but what is the last perfect movie you’ve seen in the pandemic, or post-pandemic present? (Note: Or ever?)

As rom-coms go, it far exceeds 2022’s Marry Me (starring J-Lo and Owen Wilson) and The Lost City (Sandra Bullock and Channing Tatum in the leads) any day of the week.

But that will not be the ruler against which the first gay romantic comedy released by a major studio will be measured against.

They’ll compare it to the Oscars won by Annie Hall (1977), the popularity of When Harry Met Sally (1989), the box-office mojo of Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds’ in 2009’s The Proposal (Note: $163 million domestically) and the zeitgeist reaction to Crazy Rich Asians in pre-pandemic 2018.

… which in this case means, box office success

This is meaningless.  And it takes away nothing from Bros being a very good, very smart and very entertaining film at a time when we need the very entertaining, the very smart and the very good. 

By any true measure of anything worth measuring, that makes it a success. 

Not to mention, historic.

Billy Eichner – “Love is Not Love” (from Bros)