Here’s what Girls creator-star Lena Dunham said when asked if she worried that the lead character she plays on her semi-autobiographical HBO series would be sympathetic enough to grab an audience.
“I don’t always like myself, or all the people on TV,” admitted Dunham. “Also, why can’t 25-year-old women make miserable mistakes like Larry David?”
What was most memorable about Ms. Dunham’s response was not only that it was unrehearsed and honest (you spend enough years in show business and you can tell when celebs are blowing smoke up your keester) but the reaction she got from the her fellow Sublime Primetime panelists of 2012 Emmy nominated writers (almost all male) on stage at the WGA Theatre with her. They LOVED her for it. So much so that they broke out into spontaneous applause, along with the rest of the audience, in one of the few exchanges of the entire evening of speakers that anyone will probably ever remember.
That was a far cry from the previous awkwardness of these middle-aged guys when the nervous moderator among them finally had to ask her a question. At almost half their ages and, well, a lot more stylish, it felt like they didn’t know…uh… what the heck to make of her (personally I loved the black and white polka dot dress, pixie haircut and arm tattoo that read “STAUNCH” in honor of Little Edie from “Grey Gardens” fame but hey, I am a gay man). Plus, they looked afraid, very afraid – as if she were the future and, clearly, they would have no part in it, at least not in a starring role.
Perhaps this is nonsense and I’m reading into it. But…I don’t think so. Yet Ms. Dunham was not the only one in the group that made everybody a little uneasy that night. There was also Matthew Weiner, creator-writer of Mad Men, the series that put AMC on the map and won him six of his nine Emmy Awards, including the Television Academy’s statuettes for best drama series four years running, that is until this past week.
Okay, maybe nervous is not quite the word for what they felt towards Mr. Weiner. It could have been equal amounts of respect, awe, fear and, well, maybe even a little jealousy. Yet whatever it was quickly began to dissipate when he made some of his own confessions about the cultural phenomenon he created. When pressed to analyze the success ofashow that doesn’t seem to have a particular genre and, therefore, no strong marketing demographic, Mr. Weiner didn’t appear to have an answer until the panel and audience’s uncomfortable silences gave him a long moment to think of one.
“I think its commercial uniqueness,” he said of Mad Men, “is that it doesn’t have a formula. More than any other show I’ve ever worked on, people’s (the writer’s) life experiences wind up on the show unaltered.”
And that proved to be another seemingly unrehearsed answer that actually felt real, especially if one considers Mad Men was indeed turned down by every commercial and cable network several times for just that kind of uncategorical reason before it finally found a home at the then fledgling AMC network five years after Mr. Weiner had written it as a spec pilot (and admittedly right before he was convinced it would forever wind up in his drawer as the lovely writing sample it had functioned as up until then). Also, like Ms Dunham’s response, Mr. Weiner’s answer was particularly memorable for that evening because the idea of writing a successful TV series NOT in a specific genre or WITHOUT a certain demographic seemed almost counterintuitive to what everyone on the panel and in that room of would-be writers had been hearing about TV for years from studio executives, market research studies and more than a few professors (though, hopefully, not this one).
Still, rather than the spontaneous applause given Ms. Dunham, Mr. Weiner’s answer was met with a long, immeasurable dose of awkward silence where, much like an episode of Mad Men, everyone had to stop and think. This was probably the second most memorable response of the evening and might have even given Mr. Weiner a bit more of the already ample cultural gravitas he enjoyed prior to the time the evening began.
So — Why spend this long on Ms. Dunham and Mr. Weiner?
Simply as an illustration of how easy it is for two clear WINNERS of one evening to become two clear LOSERS of another (And in the same week!). Yes, I’m talking about the Emmy Awards. Because when both Mad Men and Girls failed to win a single trophy on 2012 Emmy that night, and that’s exactly how both Lena Dunham and Matt Weiner were categorized by the media and, perhaps, by more than one or two of us. THE big losers of the night. The people who went home empty-handed. The race-horses who were bested. Who were no longer thoroughbreds. At least by the latest (American?) standards. Yes, that’s how quickly the tide, or perhaps in this case, worm, or perhaps even more apt – stomach – can turn these days.
I had the great mis fortune…uh…honor (?) of being in the audience at this year’s Emmy Awards and witnessing the Dunham-Weiner downfall. Now, don’t get me wrong. It’s certainly fun if you’ve never been or if, like me, you spent your entire childhood preparing for the next award show and reserved the prime spot in front of your family’s television months in advance. Plus, who doesn’t like something nice and shiny (assume you too are winning or will win one, because this is part of the fantasy, let’s face it) that you can use to prove to yourself and anyone else who asks in perpetuity that you’re truly wonderful?
Except after the time I spent with both Ms. Dunham and Mr. Weiner several evenings before I couldn’t help but feel, well, — sort of sick to my stomach through parts of the Emmy evening and for days after. This feeling began to painfully increase when I went to the Governor’s Ball and found myself seated beside not one but two tables of the cast and creators of the BBC’s much-lauded Downton Abbey. Both of those tables also had zero.zero Emmys between them – though the show did chalk up one supporting actress win for the unstoppable Maggie Smith (who was not in attendance and whose award was, somehow, nowhere to be seen). Still, because it’s DAME Maggie Smith, THE Maggie Smith, a venerable acting institution, that didn’t seem to really count as a true Abbey win. And it certainly didn’t stop a group of many of us naysayers from saying and even believing that technically, on Emmy night, those stuffy period Brits, for all intents and purposes, really had been shut out (that’s double goose egg again if you were keeping count) and that we Americans had emerged as victorious over the dominant British crown as we had almost two and a half centuries before.
But back to Ms. Dunham and Mr. Weiner. As if the lack of awards for them weren’t already enough to make them the cultural losers of the night, there was even more indignation yet to endure. Spotted in a Prada dress on the red carpet, Ms. Dunham was lauded in many tabloids in the next day days for also being the fashion LOSER of the evening (they didn’t see the cute black and white polka dot dress on the panel I saw!) while Mr. Weiner was reported on as being THE morose and drinking loser of the fall 2012 awards season, along with the rest of the cast and crew of Mad Men. This happened when more than one media outlet reported Weiner and company were spotted licking their woundsat an undisclosed restaurant or hotel location far away from the confines of the festive (AND VERY RED!) Governor’s Ball.
Note: Truth to be told, I actually saw Mr. Weiner and his wife hurrying out and walking against the crowd from the Governor’s Ball just as the rest of us poor schnook audience members were being ushered in. He didn’t look happy but neither did he look suicidal. He simply seemed like a guy who had enough and wanted to leave before he got trapped among another crowd full of people who would demand a suitable reaction, or perhaps even a pithy response, to one of their inane questions when clearly there was none.
Considering all of the above, I offer this observation both for you and for myself. It is very worth noting, especially if you’re any kind of creative person – whether active, aspiring, studying or retired – that today’s designer outfit IS tomorrow’s thrift store reject –which will inevitably come back into style the day after that as retro chic — until it’s worn out its welcome and lands in the trash bin once more, only to be recycled again if yet someone else decides its hip and cool and groovy.
On the other hand, there ARE classics that never go out of style. Ms. Dunham and Mr. Weiner are two of those. And there are a lot more if you go looking for them (look in the mirror and you might even find one). They’re not always the latest thing, but that doesn’t take away from their style, workmanship or lasting appeal to the right audience. Nothing and no one tempts anyone on every day of the week. Except sex , pizza, a nice glass of wine and maybe Angelina Jolie. Though I’ll bet at least two, or perhaps even three of those, have their naysayers.
Loved how Lena held her own with the old men. That was one of the best panels I’ve seen.
Right? My advice to them: You SHOULD be scared! Though I couldve done without the moderator.
Girls is the worst show on television and perhaps the worst in the history of the Home Box Office network. Its popularity and lauded status amongst people I genuinely respect and admire makes me think that this world is less and less worth saving every day.
Also, I think “Boss” on Starz is the best show on TV right now and it didn’t get a single nomination. That said, Claire Danes, Julianne Moore and “Homeland” and “Game Change” sweeping their respective categories (along with that guy from the perpetually awful and insipid “Big Bang Theory” not winning this year) gave me some faith in the Emmys.
Ha! Well, I respectfully disagree. I think the power of Girls is its ability to completely repel, as well as entice, everyone. Any show that engenders such vitriolic reaction on both sides is doing something right. And consider the fact that you liked so many of the dramatic winners might convince you to be one of the world’s superheroes we can call on when we need you!
Make room at the top for Lena Durham she’s a winner and not going away. I love the way she is comfortable with herself not fitting into the stereotypical image. She’s sharp and is sharing a her generations view of what it’s like to be twenty something now and I love experiencing it through her eyes!
I love Girls. Its so refreshing to have women on TV that are not always likable but always real. And selfish and funny and insecure and all the things we are when we are twenty. If it were Boys it would have won .
Because men are always allowed to be these things on TV and still be endearing.