“Everyone wants to be heard.”
So says Oprah and I think she’s right. Besides, who would know better than someone who’s been listening to people for the last 25 years? But what do you want to say? What do we choose to tell each other?
Rather than concentrating on how the message is delivered, the real post-millennium question seems to be – what the hell are we saying??? It is quite popular right now to get caught up in the “method of delivery,” the “media platform.” Are your eyes glazing over yet? If so, all that means is – do you watch it on film, television, online on your iPad or iPhone, in a live theatre, on the radio (that’s not watching, that’s listening) or just hear/see it in person from a friend or through the gossip grapevine (which could be on any of the platforms mentioned above).
But who really cares except the people who run those media platforms how we get the information? iPads are great (do NOT even think of taking mine away) and certainly there’s an argument to be made for giant big screen televisions that permit you NOT to have to watch the teenage girl with the long red fingernails sitting next to you at the movie theatre brazenly and unapologetically text her best friend on her bejeweled cell phone during one of the few movies you were looking forward to seeing that year.
But once you get beyond the visuals, convenience and the idea of justifiable homicide of teenagers, you’re left with – the information. The message. The, well, Oprahisms. That’s what’s important. Not the TV set, or abc.com or the OWN site you’re watching it on.
(Note: If Oprah is/was a religion I’ve/I’d finally found my place of worship only to have had it yanked right out from under me this week – so please be kind).
There was a lot being said and/or messaged this week and most of it wasn’t encouraging or, at least, Oprah reaffirming. In fact, it was downright disturbing and depressing. (except Oprah herself, but she’s now gone so…). As a writer who probably would have preferred authoring the searing theatrical dramas of the 50s, 60s and 70s rather than struggling to find my way in the more action-based and futuristically oriented 80s, 90s and 00’s of this millennium, you’d think this would be great fodder for me. In reality, it wasn’t. In fact, I found myself thrown for a loop. How could I feel unmoved (bored) and barely annoyed after watching HBO’s dramatic chronicle of our recent financial meltdown in “Too Big Too Fail?” I hate those friggin’ big banks (even though I have yet to close my big bank checking account) and the shit eating grins on their mega-rich guiltless faces. Never a fan of our former California “Governator” as either movie star or politician, why was I thoroughly uninterested when Arnold Schwarzenegger was finally unmasked (and exposed) as the kind of crude, classless person I always suspected him of being. I can remember laughing uncontrollably in 1982 after a screening of “Conan, the Barbarian,” sure that this no-talent could never become a movie star as everyone predicted. Also, it was barely even yesterday when I guffawed at the thought that the Republican party could be silly enough to think a majority of Californians could vote for this, uh….cigar-smoker as the leader of our state (Of course, I felt the same way when Ronald Reagan ran for president so that should have been some kind of signal). How could I not be gloating, or at least nodding my head in the latest version of ‘I told you so,” just even a little?
I don’t know the answers to these questions because I was plagued this week by something even more disturbing. I find this total bon-bon of a movie, this ridiculous fantasy called Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris,” to be thoroughly enchanting from beginning to end despite the fact that I’m not particularly Francophile in nature and have grown used to being disappointed more often than not by one of my former favorite filmmakers of all time in recent decades. Why would I buy into the premise that a Hollywood screenwriter about to marry a superficially shrew rich girl could walk around France at midnight and suddenly run into Ernest Hemingway, Gertrude Stein and Zelda and Scott Fitzgerald AND wind up with (spoiler alert) a great piece of art AND the person of his dreams? Life doesn’t work like that! It’s too ridiculous! And I don’t like unexplained, absurdist illogical non-stories. At all. I find them totally and thoroughly just too…silly.
But maybe they’re not in an age when the pretty images on my IPad captivate me more than the ugly images on the news, both here and overseas.
Or when the suffering of my unemployed friends and family members move me more than getting back (or watching dramatizations) of the sociopathic greed meisters who almost (or did – remains to be seen) brought down the US economy as we know/knew it.
Or when my/our real-life expectations for politicians/movie stars and hybrids of the two are so low, that what would be shocking would be to meet one of them who had NOT lied to their devoted spouse and family for 14 years. Because, I’ll cop to it for us, we’ve seen so much of that behavior delivered in so many of our TV reality programs or yes, favorite talk show(s) through countless media platforms in recent years.
Oprah might know the answer but, sadly, she’s not available to me/us anymore. At least for now. Though she did give all loyal viewers her email (firstname.lastname@example.org) and tell you could write her and if you got a response it’d be directly from her but, hey, not even I believe everything she says. No – the real answer probably comes from a 70-year-old movie from writer-director Preston Sturges called “Sullivan’s Travels.” It’s about a successful director who makes silly, escapist films and decides to go on the road and live life as a hobo (nee homeless person) so he can see the underbelly of the world and come up with a work of art that is truly important and speaks to the truths of the day. Of course, what he finds (final spoiler alert) is that the tougher the times, the more people want to laugh, be entertained and fantasize. Not in a reality show, mean-spirited kind of non-Oprah way. But perhaps in an old-fashioned, roaming the streets in Paris, kind-of life-affirming, Oprahesque (?) fantasy, best-of-ourselves, the-world-is-one, kind of style.
…No wonder I’ll miss her.